Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 328
Filter
1.
Lancet Psychiatry ; 8(12): 1071-1082, 2021 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34801129

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The WHO Comprehensive Mental Health Action Plan 2013-2030 encourages routine collection and reporting of a set of essential mental health indicators, including the availability of psychotropic medicines. The global monitoring of country-level psychotropic medicine consumption trends can provide information on the extent of the availability of psychotropic medicines. The primary objective of this study was to investigate global trends in psychotropic medicines consumption from 2008 to 2019 across 65 countries and regions according to country income level and geographical region. METHODS: In this longitudinal trends study, we used pharmaceutical sales data from the IQVIA-Multinational Integrated Data Analysis System (IQVIA-MIDAS). We analysed monthly sales data of psychotropic medicines between Jan 1, 2008, and Dec 31, 2019. Total psychotropic medicine consumption included sales of antidepressants, antipsychotics, tranquilisers, sedatives or hypnotics, and mood stabilisers. Population estimates of each country or region (eight lower-middle-income countries, 19 upper-middle-income countries, and 38 high-income countries) were based on the UN World Population Prospects 2019 report. Average annual sales trends of psychotropic medicines, expressed as defined daily dose (DDD) per 1000 inhabitants per day, were estimated using a random-effects model adjusted for income level and region. Relative changes in the annual consumption of psychotropic medicines by income, expressed as DDD per 1000 inhabitants per day, were assessed as percentage change for each medicine class. FINDINGS: Psychotropic medicine sales increased from 28·54 DDD per 1000 inhabitants per day in 2008 to 34·77 DDD per 1000 inhabitants per day in 2019, corresponding to a 4·08% (95% CI 2·96-5·21) relative average increase annually. The absolute annual increase was greater in high-income countries (3·31 DDD per 1000 inhabitants per day, 95% CI 3·01-3·61) compared with upper-middle-income countries (1·94 DDD per 1000 inhabitants per day, 1·45-2·44) and low-middle-income countries (0·88 DDD per 1000 inhabitants per day, 0·62-1·13; p<0·0001). The relative average annual increase in psychotropic medicine sales from 2008 to 2019 was greater in upper-middle-income countries (7·88%, 95% CI 6·99-8·77) than in lower-middle-income countries (2·90%, 2·40-3·39) and high-income countries (1·02%, 0·80-1·24). In 2019, the regional consumption of psychotropic medicines varied greatly, with the highest sales of all psychotropic medicine classes reported in northern America (167·54 DDD per 1000 inhabitants per day) and lowest sales reported in Asia (5·59 DDD per 1000 inhabitants per day). 17 countries had very low consumption of psychotropic medicines in 2019, including high-income countries and countries with a high prevalence of mental disorders. INTERPRETATION: The consumption of psychotropic medicines has increased over a 12-year period, and although the absolute growth rate was highest in high-income countries, the relative growth is highest in middle-income countries and especially upper-middle-income countries. Disparities in psychotropic medicine consumption of countries can only partly be explained by geographical location and income. Greater efforts are needed to increase the availability of psychotropic medicines in countries with very low consumption, which is probably due to financial or cultural reasons as well as scarcity of trained health-care professionals to prescribe psychotropic medicines. FUNDING: None.


Subject(s)
Drug Utilization , Psychotropic Drugs , Health Services Accessibility , Humans , Longitudinal Studies , Mental Disorders/drug therapy , Psychotropic Drugs/economics , Psychotropic Drugs/therapeutic use
2.
Med Care ; 58(9): 763-769, 2020 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32732784

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Increases in prescription drug cost-sharing may decrease adherence to treatment among persons with schizophrenia and lead to discontinuation of use and an increased risk of hospitalization. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to investigate the impact of new deductible and increased drug copayments implemented on antipsychotic and other drug purchases and on rates of hospitalizations and primary care contacts among persons with schizophrenia in Finland. RESEARCH DESIGN: Interrupted time series analysis. SUBJECTS: All persons with schizophrenia in Finland who were alive at the beginning of 2015 (N=41,017). MEASURES: We measured the rates of antipsychotic, other psychotropic and cardiometabolic drug purchasers, hospitalizations, and primary care contacts during 2015 and 2016 with data collected from several nationwide health care registers. RESULTS: During 2016, the proportion of antipsychotic purchasers decreased by -0.26 percentage points per month [95% confidence interval (CI): -0.47 to -0.05] compared with 2015. The trend of other psychotropic purchasers decreased to -0.13 percentage points per month in 2016 (95% CI: -0.22 to -0.04) compared with 2015 and cardiometabolic drug purchases to -0.17 percentage points per month (95% CI: -0.29 to -0.05) compared with 2015. The decreasing trend of psychiatric hospitalizations in 2015 halted in 2016. There were no other significant differences in health care utilization. CONCLUSIONS: In our nationwide time-series analysis, we observed decreases in the slopes of antipsychotic and other drug purchases of persons with schizophrenia after prescription drug cost-sharing increase implementation on January 1, 2016. Policymakers need to be aware of the unintended consequences of increasing cost-sharing among people with severe mental disorders.


Subject(s)
Antipsychotic Agents/administration & dosage , Antipsychotic Agents/economics , Cost Sharing/statistics & numerical data , Medication Adherence/statistics & numerical data , Schizophrenia/drug therapy , Adult , Aged , Antipsychotic Agents/therapeutic use , Female , Finland , Hospitalization/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Interrupted Time Series Analysis , Male , Middle Aged , Patient Acceptance of Health Care/statistics & numerical data , Primary Health Care/statistics & numerical data , Psychotropic Drugs/administration & dosage , Psychotropic Drugs/economics
3.
J Nerv Ment Dis ; 208(7): 566-573, 2020 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32604163

ABSTRACT

This study examined opinions of American psychiatrists regarding prior authorization (PA) requirements for third-party payer coverage of medications and quantified perceived impact of these requirements on clinical practice. One thousand selected psychiatrist members of the American Psychiatric Association were invited to participate in a survey. Response rate was 33.1%. Respondents predominantly believed the obligation to obtain PA reduces job satisfaction and negatively impacts patient care. A total of 59.9% of respondents reported employing either diagnosis modification or falsification of previous medication trials at least occasionally in order to obtain PA. A total of 66.6% refrained at least occasionally from prescribing preferred medications due to PA requirement or expectation of one. On multivariate analysis, risk factors for refraining at higher frequency included seeing 300 or more patients in the previous 3 months, engaging more frequently in diagnosis modification, and reporting increased perception that obtaining PA reduces time for patient care.


Subject(s)
Insurance, Pharmaceutical Services/economics , Job Satisfaction , Prior Authorization/organization & administration , Psychiatry/statistics & numerical data , Psychotropic Drugs/economics , Adult , Aged , Fees, Pharmaceutical , Female , Health Expenditures/trends , Humans , Insurance, Psychiatric/economics , Logistic Models , Male , Medicaid , Middle Aged , Multivariate Analysis , Prior Authorization/economics , Psychiatry/organization & administration , Psychotropic Drugs/therapeutic use , Surveys and Questionnaires , United States
4.
J Clin Psychopharmacol ; 40(4): 396-400, 2020.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32639292

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Antidepressant augmentation strategies for treatment-resistant depression (TRD) are discussed here with an analysis of patient out-of-pocket costs for various medications. The choice of agent ranges from newer atypical antipsychotics (aripiprazole, brexpiprazole, quetiapine) to older agents including buspirone, liothyronine (T3), and lithium. We sought to better understand the differences among these agents to aid in clinical decision making. METHODS: We conducted a focused review of the support for each of the aforementioned agents in antidepressant augmentation. We then compared the approximate out-of-pocket cost for each medication during a typical augmentation trial using the typical prescription costs on ClinCalc.com derived from the Medical Expenditure Panel Survey. We calculated the cost to achieve response for one patient with TRD based on the number needed to treat (NNT). FINDINGS: We observed significant variance in cost to achieve response based on the NNT derived from our review of each of the medications. For example, the overall out-of-pocket cost for one patient to achieve response with aripiprazole (the costliest generic agent) could cover lithium prescriptions for 4 to 5 patients with TRD to achieve response. Although brexpiprazole was estimated separately because of its brand name cost, we estimated that 324 patients receiving lithium could achieve response for same cost of single patient receiving brexpiprazole. IMPLICATIONS: These findings suggest that among augmentation agents, there are differences in cost that may be highly important in clinical decision making. Other issues of medication monitoring may incur additional costs, and brand name medications offer significantly greater complexity and potential out-of-pocket costs to patients. The use of lithium as a first-line agent for TRD should be considered based on low cost, lowest NNT, and data in support of its efficacy.


Subject(s)
Antidepressive Agents/economics , Clinical Decision-Making , Depressive Disorder, Treatment-Resistant/economics , Drug Costs/statistics & numerical data , Psychotropic Drugs/economics , Antidepressive Agents/therapeutic use , Depressive Disorder, Treatment-Resistant/drug therapy , Humans , Psychotropic Drugs/therapeutic use
5.
Eur J Pharmacol ; 875: 173012, 2020 May 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32087255

ABSTRACT

As recreational substances, synthetic cathinones started to be used at the beginning of the 21st century. There is still limited data on these compounds, introduced to the illicit drug market for the most part after 2009. Considering that synthetic cathinones are currently the second largest group of new psychoactive and dangerous substances among over 670 new psychoactive substances identified in Europe and monitored by the EMCDDA, research on them should be regarded as extremely important. This review focuses on the availability of synthetic cathinones on the illicit drug market, presentation of current trends in the use of these substances, and their mechanisms of action and toxicity. The authors discuss cases of intoxication with synthetic cathinones and post-mortem diagnostics as well as the problem of combined used of synthetic cathinones with other psychoactive substances. Literature as well as clinical and forensic data indicate the need for further research on the metabolism, toxicokinetics, toxicodynamics, clinical effects, and addictive potential of synthetic cathinones, especially in the context of potential threats caused by increased consumption of this group of drugs in future.


Subject(s)
Alkaloids/pharmacology , Central Nervous System Stimulants/pharmacology , Illicit Drugs/pharmacology , Psychotropic Drugs/pharmacology , Synthetic Drugs/pharmacology , Alkaloids/chemical synthesis , Alkaloids/economics , Catha/chemistry , Central Nervous System Stimulants/chemical synthesis , Central Nervous System Stimulants/economics , Europe , Humans , Illicit Drugs/chemical synthesis , Illicit Drugs/economics , Psychotropic Drugs/chemical synthesis , Psychotropic Drugs/economics , Synthetic Drugs/chemical synthesis , Synthetic Drugs/economics
6.
Nord J Psychiatry ; 74(4): 301-306, 2020 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31889460

ABSTRACT

Purpose: While the pivotal role of pharmacotherapy in psychiatry is universal, significant regional differences exist in drug use patterns. Herewith we compare the use of ATC psychotropic drugs (N05, psycholeptics and N06A, antidepressants) in 2010-2015 in the three Baltic Countries with reference to the Nordic Countries.Methods: Data were obtained from the national authorities on medicines as expressed in DDD per 1000 inhabitants per day. A semi-structured questionnaire was used for expert statements on the rationale of current use of medicines.Results: During the observation period the use of antipsychotics, anxiolytics, hypnotics and sedatives, and antidepressants steadily increased, while the growth in use of anxiolytics stagnated in the more recent years. Antipsychotic use was the largest in Lithuania and the lowest in Estonia. The use on anxiolytics in Lithuania was more than twice of that in Estonia and Latvia. Conversely, the use of hypnotics and sedatives was about three times higher in Estonia than in Latvia or Lithuania. Antidepressant use was dominated by the selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors in all three countries, but overall was much lower in Latvia as compared to Lithuania and Estonia. As compared to the Nordic Countries in 2015, antidepressants are used at much lower level throughout Baltics, probably reflecting underdiagnostics of depression and anxiety disorders.Conclusion: While the health-care expenditures in Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania are largely similar, as is the cultural and recent political background of these EU member countries, the extent and the pattern of psychotropic drug use is remarkably variable.


Subject(s)
Mental Disorders/drug therapy , Psychotropic Drugs/therapeutic use , Surveys and Questionnaires , Estonia/epidemiology , Humans , Latvia/epidemiology , Lithuania/epidemiology , Male , Mental Disorders/economics , Mental Disorders/epidemiology , Psychotropic Drugs/economics , Scandinavian and Nordic Countries/epidemiology
7.
Int J Geriatr Psychiatry ; 35(1): 131-137, 2020 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31657080

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the cost-consequences of an intervention for the management of neuropsychiatric symptoms in nursing home residents with young-onset dementia. METHODS: A stepped wedge design was used. The intervention consisted of an educational program and a multidisciplinary care program and was implemented in 13 nursing homes from September 2015 to March 2017. Costs' outcomes included the time investment of the elderly care physician and health care psychologists regarding the management of neuropsychiatric symptoms, residents' psychotropic drug use, nursing staff absenteeism, and costs of the educational program. Composite cost measure contained the sum of costs of staff absenteeism, costs on psychotropic drugs, and costs of the educational program. Costs of time investment were investigated by comparing means. Costs of psychotropic drug use were analyzed with mixed models at resident level and as part of the composite cost measure on unit level. Staff absenteeism was also analyzed at unit level. RESULTS: Compared with care as usual, the mean costs of time invested decreased with €36.79 for the elderly care physician but increased with €46.05 for the health care psychologist in the intervention condition. Mixed model analysis showed no effect of the intervention compared with care as usual on the costs of psychotropic drug use, staff absenteeism, and the composite cost measure. The costs of the educational program were on average €174.13 per resident. CONCLUSION: The intervention did not result in increased costs compared with care as usual. Other aspects, such as the lack of a structured working method, should be taken into account when considering implementation of the intervention.


Subject(s)
Dementia/economics , Dementia/therapy , Health Care Costs/statistics & numerical data , Nursing Homes/economics , Age of Onset , Costs and Cost Analysis , Humans , Middle Aged , Nursing Homes/organization & administration , Nursing Staff/economics , Psychotropic Drugs/economics , Psychotropic Drugs/therapeutic use
8.
Transcult Psychiatry ; 57(1): 81-93, 2020 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31838958

ABSTRACT

This article examines drug adherence in relation to changing patterns of medical pluralism and neoliberal reforms among psychiatric patients in postreform Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam. We conducted 39 in-depth interviews and 21 follow-up interviews with individuals prescribed psychiatric medication on an outpatient basis in 2016 to identify patterns of nonadherence, which was operationalized as taking medications according to doctors' prescriptions at the three-month follow-up interval. Patients adapt or reject their medication prescriptions due to (1) concerns about biomedical drugs and adverse drug reactions, (2) local concepts of psychic distress and selfhood, and (3) the social context of medicine taking. The dominant theoretical models of drug adherence focus on individual-level predictors. However, situating drug adherence in its political-economic context highlights the relationship between medicine and neoliberal modernity that underlies adherence. Examining the intersection of multiple medication regimens and political regimes, we argue that nonadherence is rooted in a complex layering of medical traditions and modernist projects of the self. The reception of new biomedical drugs in Vietnam is shaped by not only folk theories of illness but also a changing cultural politics of the self.


Subject(s)
Cultural Diversity , Health Care Reform , Medication Adherence , Psychotropic Drugs/economics , Humans , Politics , Vietnam
9.
J Geriatr Psychiatry Neurol ; 33(6): 324-332, 2020 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31842673

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: We compared economic outcomes when elderly patients with neuropsychiatric disorders received psychotropic medications guided by a combinatorial pharmacogenomic (PGx) test. METHODS: This is a subanalysis of a 1-year prospective assessment of medication cost for patients with neuropsychiatric disorders receiving combinatorial PGx testing. Pharmacy claims were used to compare per member per year (PMPY) medication cost for patients ≥65 and <65 years old when medications were congruent or incongruent with the PGx test. Polypharmacy was also assessed. RESULTS: Congruent prescribing was associated with savings of US$3497 PMPY (P < .001) for patients ≥65 years and US$2467 PMPY (P < .001) for patients <65, compared to incongruent prescribing. Congruent prescribing in patients ≥65 treated by primary care providers was associated with US$4113 PMPY (P = .026) in savings, while congruent prescribing by psychiatrists was associated with US$120 PMPY (P = .719). Congruent prescribing was also associated with one fewer neuropsychiatric medication for patients ≥65 (P = .070). CONCLUSION: Congruence with PGx testing was associated with medication cost savings in elderly patients.


Subject(s)
Drug Prescriptions/statistics & numerical data , Genetic Testing/economics , Mental Disorders/drug therapy , Pharmacogenetics/economics , Pharmacogenomic Testing/economics , Psychotropic Drugs/economics , Aged , Antidepressive Agents/economics , Antidepressive Agents/therapeutic use , Antipsychotic Agents/economics , Antipsychotic Agents/therapeutic use , Drug Costs/statistics & numerical data , Fees, Pharmaceutical/statistics & numerical data , Female , Genetic Testing/methods , Geriatric Psychiatry , Humans , Male , Mental Disorders/psychology , Middle Aged , Pharmacogenetics/methods , Prescription Drugs/economics , Prospective Studies , Psychotropic Drugs/therapeutic use
10.
J Manag Care Spec Pharm ; 25(5): 555-565, 2019 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31039063

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Psychotropic polypharmacy is not uncommon among cancer patients and may contribute to the increased direct health care cost burden in this population. OBJECTIVE: To estimate average direct health care costs in the year following cancer diagnosis among cancer patients receiving psychotropic polypharmacy compared with those without psychotropic polypharmacy, using a multivariable analysis framework. METHODS: A retrospective cross-sectional study was conducted among patients aged 18 years and older diagnosed with the most commonly occurring cancers (breast, prostate, lung, and colorectal) in the United States during 2011-2012 using the deidentified Optum Clinformatics Data Mart commercial claims database. Psychotropic polypharmacy was defined as concurrent use of 2 or more psychotropic medications for at least 90 days. Direct health care costs in the year following cancer diagnosis were estimated as total medical payments made by the health plans and were derived from claims files. A generalized linear regression model with log-link function and gamma distribution was used to model average direct health care costs, controlling for baseline patient demographic and clinical covariates. RESULTS: Average annual direct health care costs for cancer patients with psychotropic polypharmacy ($53,497; SD $72,590) were higher than those without psychotropic polypharmacy ($38,255; SD $59,844), with an unadjusted average cost difference of $15,242 (P < 0.0001). In the adjusted regression model, the average difference in costs shrunk to $5,888 but remained notable. When examined by type of cancer, average direct health care costs for all cancer patients with psychotropic polypharmacy were significantly higher than those for patients without psychotropic polypharmacy, except for colorectal cancer patients. CONCLUSIONS: Overall health care costs were higher among cancer patients with psychotropic polypharmacy compared with those without psychotropic polypharmacy. Our findings support the need for future research to better understand the benefits and risks of psychotropic polypharmacy, given its potential to cause adverse health outcomes and avoidable health care utilization and costs for this vulnerable patient population. DISCLOSURES: This study was funded by the American Association of Colleges of Pharmacy (AACP) New Investigator Award mechanism, which was received by Vyas. Aroke was partially supported by the AACP grant for conducting data analysis of the study. Kogut is partially supported by Institutional Development Award Number U54GM115677 from the National Institute of General Medical Sciences of the National Institutes of Health, which funds Advance Clinical and Translational Research (Advance-CTR). The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health and the AACP. The authors report no conflicts of interest. An abstract of this study was presented as a poster at the American Association of Colleges of Pharmacy Annual Meeting on July 22, 2018, in Boston, MA.


Subject(s)
Adjustment Disorders/drug therapy , Cost of Illness , Health Care Costs/statistics & numerical data , Neoplasms/economics , Psychotropic Drugs/economics , Adjustment Disorders/economics , Adjustment Disorders/psychology , Adult , Aged , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Neoplasms/psychology , Neoplasms/therapy , Polypharmacy , Psychotropic Drugs/therapeutic use , Retrospective Studies , United States , Young Adult
11.
Autism ; 23(8): 2020-2030, 2019 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30943759

ABSTRACT

A number of cross-sectional studies report extensive use of psychiatric services and high healthcare costs in autistic youths. However, little is known about how the use of these services evolves from the time of diagnosis, as children grow up. Our objectives were to investigate the use, costs, and predictors of psychiatric services following autism spectrum diagnosis. We built a cohort of 1227 newly diagnosed autism spectrum individuals identified in the Quebec (Canada) Régie de l'assurance maladie du Québec administrative database (January 1998 to December 2010). Mean number and cost per individual of psychiatric healthcare use (hospitalizations, medical visits, psychoactive drug use) were calculated yearly for 5 years following autism spectrum diagnosis. Mean number of psychiatric visits decreased over time by more than threefold (7.5 vs 2.1 visits) from year 1 to year 5, whereas psychoactive drug use increased from 16.0 to 25.2 claims. Psychiatric hospitalizations decreased during follow-up, but still represented the greatest costs per individual (CAD9820 for year 1; CAD4628 for year 5). Antipsychotics represented over 50% of drug costs. Mixed-effect model with repeated measures showed that previous psychoactive drug use was the strongest predictor of greater psychiatric healthcare cost during follow-up (odds ratio: 9.96; 95% confidence interval: 7.58-13.10). These trends contrast with guidelines advocating cautious prescribing of antipsychotics with periodical re-assessment of their benefit.


Subject(s)
Autism Spectrum Disorder/epidemiology , Health Care Costs/statistics & numerical data , Hospitalization/statistics & numerical data , Mental Health Services/statistics & numerical data , Psychotropic Drugs/therapeutic use , Adolescent , Adult , Antipsychotic Agents/economics , Antipsychotic Agents/therapeutic use , Anxiety Disorders/epidemiology , Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity/epidemiology , Child , Child, Preschool , Comorbidity , Conduct Disorder/epidemiology , Developmental Disabilities/epidemiology , Drug Costs/statistics & numerical data , Epilepsy/epidemiology , Female , General Practice , Hospitalization/economics , Humans , Infant , Intellectual Disability/epidemiology , Male , Mental Health Services/economics , Mood Disorders/epidemiology , Odds Ratio , Psychotropic Drugs/economics , Quebec/epidemiology , Schizophrenia/epidemiology , Young Adult
12.
Int J Drug Policy ; 73: 263-272, 2019 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30772109

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Nonmedical prescription psychiatric drug use (NMPDU) is an increasing global health problem, with recent concern focusing on darknet cryptomarkets as sources of procurement. There is a shortage of evidence regarding comparative worldwide NMPDU trends, due in part to data collection difficulties. This problem is particularly marked for non-opioid drugs, particularly those psychiatric drugs which act on the central nervous system (CNS) and have high misuse potential and are associated with high levels of dependency and fatal overdose. This paper therefore has two goals: 1) to report on the kinds of psychiatric prescription drugs available on cryptomarkets, and 2) to use this data to uncover temporal and geographical trends in sales of these products, potentially informing policy regarding NMPDU more generally. METHOD: Digital trace data collected from 31 cryptomarkets in operation between September 2013 and July 2016 was analysed by country of origin descriptively and for trends in the sales for 7 psychiatric drug groupings, based on their main indication or intended use in psychiatric practice. RESULTS: Sedatives (such as diazepam and alprazolam) and CNS stimulants (mainly Adderall, modafinil and methylphenidate) had the greatest share of sales, but usage and trends varied by location. The UK has high and rising levels of sedative sales, whilst the USA has the greatest stimulant sales and increasing sedative rates. Sales of drugs used in the treatment of opioid dependency are also substantial in the USA. The picture is less clear in mainland Europe with high sales levels reported in unexpected Central and Northern European countries. There is evidence of a move towards the more potent sedative alprazolam - already implicated as a source of problematic NMPDU in the USA - in Australia and the UK. Sales of drugs such as antidepressants, antipsychotics, mood stabilisers and antidementia drugs - all drugs with limited abuse potential - were negligible, indicating minimal levels of online cryptomarket procurement for self-medicating mental health problems. CONCLUSION: Predominantly, psychiatric drugs with potent sedative, stimulant or euphoriant effects are sold on cryptomarkets and this varies by country. With some caveats regarding the limitations of cryptomarket digital trace data taken into account, the study of trends of these products sold online over time may offer a novel and increasingly important window onto wider drug purchasing habits.


Subject(s)
Commerce/statistics & numerical data , Drug Trafficking/statistics & numerical data , Internet , Prescription Drug Misuse/statistics & numerical data , Psychotropic Drugs/supply & distribution , Drug Trafficking/economics , Humans , Prescription Drug Misuse/economics , Prescription Drugs/economics , Prescription Drugs/supply & distribution , Psychotropic Drugs/economics , Substance-Related Disorders/epidemiology
13.
Community Ment Health J ; 55(1): 31-37, 2019 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29520576

ABSTRACT

Constant observation (CO) is a common economic burden on general hospitals. A quality improvement (QI) project focusing on behavioral health (BH) management of this population was piloted using a novel BH protocol for the proactive assessment and management of all patients requiring CO. The impact on CO-cost and length of stay (LOS) was assessed. Data on demographics, diagnoses, psychopharmacologic treatment, complications and clinical setting were collected and analyzed for all CO-patients over a 6-month period. Cost and LOS data were compared with a similar sequential group prior to project implementation. Out of the 533 patients requiring CO during the study period, 491 underwent the protocol. This QI-project resulted in a significant reduction in the average monthly CO-cost by 33.06% and a 15% reduction in LOS without any increase in complications.


Subject(s)
Behavioral Medicine/economics , Behavioral Medicine/methods , Homicide , Suicide , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Costs and Cost Analysis , Female , Homicide/economics , Homicide/psychology , Hospitals, General , Humans , Inpatients , Length of Stay , Male , Middle Aged , Pilot Projects , Psychotropic Drugs/economics , Psychotropic Drugs/therapeutic use , Quality Improvement , Suicide/economics , Suicide/psychology
14.
Psychiatry Res ; 271: 389-395, 2019 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30529876

ABSTRACT

Non-adherence to prescribed medications is a systemic public health concern. Financial strain, the extent to which an individual is unable to afford necessary items, may represent an important factor related to adherence. This study evaluated the association between financial strain and medication adherence as a function of medication type. Participants reporting a daily prescription for psychiatric or other chronic health conditions (N = 231) were sampled from the crowdsourcing website Amazon Mechanical Turk (mTurk). All participants completed measures of financial strain and other individual-difference factors related to adherence. Medication adherence was evaluated using a subjective scale (i.e., ARMS) and past month non-adherence rates. General financial strain showed a modest relationship with subjective scales of adherence, but not past month non-adherence rates. Medication-specific financial strain was associated with greater non-adherence, even after controlling for relevant demographic, socio-economic, and personality factors. Medication-specific financial strain also disproportionately affected individuals taking psychiatric medications relative to those not taking psychiatric medications. These findings emphasize the role that financial strain plays in medication adherence, and in particular, in psychiatric conditions. Future studies could design interventions targeting financial strain to improve clinical adherence, broadly, and psychiatric medication adherence, specifically.


Subject(s)
Chronic Disease/drug therapy , Economic Status/statistics & numerical data , Medication Adherence/statistics & numerical data , Mental Disorders/drug therapy , Psychotropic Drugs/economics , Adult , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged
15.
Can Bull Med Hist ; 35(2): 247-277, 2018.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30274524

ABSTRACT

The visualization of mental illness has attracted substantial attention from scholars in recent decades. Due to the invisible nature of mental disorders, this work has stressed the importance of representations in shaping perceptions of mental illness. In the second half of the 20th century, advertisements for psychopharmaceutical medications became important avenues through which mental illness was made visible. This article analyzes how drug advertisements portrayed mentally ill individuals in medical journal advertisements from 14 countries between 1953 and 2005. We argue that a shift in representations occurred in the 1980s: whereas earlier campaigns were dominated by images of the mentally ill suffering in isolation, the post-1980s period was marked by a trend toward "positive" imagery, social inclusion, and ordinariness. This shift re-imagines the role of psychopharmaceuticals and who might be understood as mentally ill, reflecting changes in global marketing and the arrival of the "happiness turn" within the pharmaceutical industry.


Subject(s)
Advertising/history , Drug Industry/history , History, 20th Century , History, 21st Century , Humans , Imagination , Mental Disorders , Mentally Ill Persons/statistics & numerical data , Psychotropic Drugs/economics
16.
Eur Neuropsychopharmacol ; 28(12): 1351-1359, 2018 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30243681

ABSTRACT

To critically examine the effectiveness of lithium in preventing depressive symptoms (mixed and depressive episodes) in real life settings, taking into account adherence to drug treatment and its implications for the clinical costs of the disease. Overall, 72 patients with bipolar disorder initially treated with lithium carbonate were included and followed-up for 10 years. Patients were assessed every 8 weeks for morbidity and alcohol/drug consumption. Patients with good adherence to lithium had fewer episodes with depressive features than poor adherers (B = 2.405, p = 0.046) and also fewer manic and hypomanic episodes (B = 2.572; p < 0.001), after controlling for confounders. Time to relapse into a depressive or mixed episode and into a manic or hypomanic episode was shorter in patients with poor adherence. The costs of the 1.95 ±â€¯2.38 (mean ±â€¯standard deviation) admissions of adherent patients through the 10 years of follow-up were €10,349, while the costs of the 6.25 ±â€¯4.92 admissions of non-adherent patients were €44,547. In clinical practice settings, long-term lithium salts seem to have a preventive effect on depressive symptoms.


Subject(s)
Bipolar Disorder/drug therapy , Bipolar Disorder/psychology , Depression/prevention & control , Lithium Carbonate/therapeutic use , Medication Adherence , Psychotropic Drugs/therapeutic use , Adult , Bipolar Disorder/economics , Depression/economics , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Health Care Costs , Humans , Lithium Carbonate/economics , Male , Patient Admission/economics , Psychotropic Drugs/economics , Recurrence , Survival Analysis , Treatment Outcome
17.
Neurol India ; 66(5): 1427-1433, 2018.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30233018

ABSTRACT

CONTEXT: This study investigated the cost variation among neuropsychiatric drugs prevalent in the Indian market with reference to the National List of Essential Medicines (NLEM, 2015). AIMS: To promote the rational use of medicines through cost variation analysis among drugs for neuropsychiatric disorders enlisted in NLEM and those not included in NLEM (NNLEM). STUDY DESIGN: This study included drugs used for epilepsy, migraine, psychosis, depression, generalized anxiety disorder (GAD), bipolar disorder, and obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD). MATERIALS AND METHODS: The unit drug cost for the selected strengths of different manufacturers mentioned in the Current Index of Medical Specialities 2016 was used for calculating cost/defined daily dose (DDD). STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: Comparison was done among individual drugs and groups (NLEM and NNLEM) by cost/DDD in terms of interquartile range, percentage cost variation, and cost ratio. RESULTS: The cost variation is wide for neuropsychiatric drugs (maximum, 1724.3% for risperidone in NLEM, and 1780% for olanzapine in NNLEM). The drug-to-cost ratio is the highest (168.8 times) for bipolar disorder and the lowest (9.7 times) for GAD. The NLEM drugs were found to be more economical than the NNLEM drugs among antiepileptic drugs, antidepressants, and drugs for bipolar disorder; however, the reverse was noted for antimigraine drugs and drugs for GAD. Antipsychotic medications and drugs for OCD in the NLEM group have a wider range than in the NNLEM group. CONCLUSIONS: The NLEM group has economical drugs in some disease categories; there is a need to consider the cost effectiveness of all drug categories while revising the NLEM next time and attention should focus on drug price regulation policies to accomplish the goal of rational use of medicines.


Subject(s)
Drug Costs , Psychotropic Drugs/economics , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Humans , India
19.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29469240

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To assess through a systematic review of the literature if the practice of splitting tablets containing psychoactive/psychotropic medications for medical or economic reasons would result in the expected doses. DATA SOURCES: A MEDLINE and PsycInfo comprehensive search of English-language publications from January 1999 to December 2015 was conducted using the terms describing tablet splitting (tablet splitting, split tablets, tablet subdivision, divided tablets, and half tablets) and psychoactive substances (psychoactive medicines, psychotropic medicines, antidepressants, anxiolytics, anticonvulsants, antipsychotics, and antiparkinsonian agents). An additional supplementary search included the references from the articles found. STUDY SELECTION/DATA EXTRACTION: Studies were included if splitting content was directly related to psychoactive medications and examined the effect of tablet splitting on drug uniformity, weight uniformity, and adherence of psychoactive drugs. Articles were systematically reviewed and examined regarding the study design, methodology, and results of the study. A total of 125 articles were screened, and 13 were selected. RESULTS: Tablet splitting implications are extensive, yet substantial deviations from the ideal weight, potency, and dose uniformity are more prone to be important to patient safety. The uneven division of tablets might result in the administration of different doses than what was prescribed, causing under- or overdosing, which might be relevant depending on the drug. In 55% of the cases, splitting psychoactive drugs was satisfactory. CONCLUSIONS: It cannot be generalized that splitting psychoactive drugs compromises dose accuracy, thus tablet splitting might still be employed in cases in which the advantages outweigh the disadvantages. It is recommended that alternatives be adopted to prevent the disadvantages related to tablet splitting.


Subject(s)
Psychotropic Drugs/administration & dosage , Humans , Psychotropic Drugs/adverse effects , Psychotropic Drugs/economics , Tablets
20.
J Clin Psychiatry ; 79(2)2018.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29419948

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: This study sought to assess the cost-effectiveness of 7 treatment strategies for treatment-refractory obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) in adults. METHODS: A model was developed to evaluate treatment alternatives for adults (18-64 years old) that consisted of 2 parts: a decision analytic model and a Markov model. The decision analytic model stratified 7 outpatient treatment strategies, and the Markov model accumulated benefits and costs across the life expectancy of a simulated cohort of individuals. The model was parameterized with probabilistic and deterministic parameters from the literature and an outcomes database to perform a Monte Carlo simulation of a hypothetical cohort of 100,000 adults with OCD to estimate net health benefits (NHBs), costs, and incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) for each treatment strategy. OCD was considered treatment refractory in adults with an OCD diagnosis who failed first-line therapies. Encounters took place from 2012 to 2015, and the analyses were performed from November 2016 to February 2017. RESULTS: Partial hospitalization with step-down to intensive outpatient treatment was the most cost-effective of the 7 strategies, with an estimated ICER of $7,983 and mean (SD) NHB of 10.96 (0.53) quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) remaining. This result was 2.2 QALYs greater than that of the trial-based antidepressant and cognitive-behavioral therapy (ADM + CBT) strategy. Three additional ADM + CBT strategies were estimated not to be statistically significantly different from each other. These 4 ADM + CBT strategies outperformed both pharmacotherapy-only strategies. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment strategies that include higher-intensity CBT, with effectiveness outcomes that approached efficacy estimates, were superior to real-world CBT strategies. However, given the limited availability of high-quality CBT, especially through use of commercial insurance networks, specialized treatment programs offer greater effectiveness than real-world therapies in achieving wellness for this severe patient population.


Subject(s)
Cognitive Behavioral Therapy , Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder , Psychotropic Drugs , Adult , Cognitive Behavioral Therapy/economics , Cognitive Behavioral Therapy/methods , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder/economics , Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder/therapy , Psychotropic Drugs/economics , Psychotropic Drugs/therapeutic use , Quality-Adjusted Life Years , Severity of Illness Index , Treatment Failure , Treatment Outcome , United States
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...